What evidence does SOC 2 SOC2-PI1.3 need?

Job scheduling and processing monitoring with failure alerts. Error queues and evidence of correction. Processing logs and control totals

SOC2-PI1.3 of SOC 2, stated here in our words and cited to that clause.

Does it map to the other framework?

The held record carries no reviewed link for this control, and does not invent one.

SOC 2 PI1.3 evidence: PI1.3 Controls over system processing

SOC 2 PI1.3: PI1.3 Controls over system processing

SOC 2 PI1.3 covers PI1.3 Controls over system processing. The held text names 3 evidence records for it, the first being Job scheduling and processing monitoring with failure alerts. The common gap an assessor flags is Failed jobs rerun without investigating data impact.

Policies and procedures over system processing produce products, services and reporting that meet objectives. Points of focus: processing specifications needed to meet requirements are defined; processing activities are defined to meet them; production errors are detected and corrected promptly; processing is recorded completely, accurately and on time; and authorised inputs are processed in full, correctly and on schedule.

What evidence supports PI1.3?

Processing integrityJob scheduling and processing monitoring with failure alerts
Processing integrityError queues and evidence of correction
Processing integrityProcessing logs and control totals

Where this requirement comes from

This is our own statement of SOC 2 PI1.3, read from the copy we hold (issuer free complete copy) and stated in our words, not the standard verbatim. The framework as we hold it.

Common gaps an assessor flags

Failed jobs rerun without investigating data impact
No control totals across processing stages
Processing errors corrected without a record

How it maps to ISO 27001:2022

No reviewed link is held for this control.

A link is a topical overlap with a confidence and a reason. It does not establish that meeting one requirement satisfies the other, and it is not certification.