Evidence Binderthe free audit-evidence library, and the binder you build from it

SOC 2 · CC - Common Criteria (Security)

SOC 2 CC6.3: CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

SOC 2 CC6.3 covers CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties. The held text names 5 evidence records for it, the first being Role definitions and role-to-permission matrix. The common gap an assessor flags is Role changes add access without removing the old.

Rights over data, programs, functions and other protected assets is granted, changed or removed according to roles, responsibilities or system design and changes, applying least privilege and segregation of duties. Points of focus: access is created or modified on the asset owner's authorisation; it is removed when no longer needed; access structures (role-based, for example) limit privileges and separate incompatible functions; and roles and access rules are reviewed periodically for people who no longer need them (staff, contractors, vendors, partner personnel) and for system or service accounts that should not exist, and adjusted.

What evidence supports CC6.3?

Where this requirement comes from

This is our own statement of SOC 2 CC6.3, read from the copy we hold (issuer free complete copy) and stated in our words, not the standard verbatim. The framework as we hold it.

Common gaps an assessor flags

How it maps to ISO 27001:2022

A link is a topical overlap with a confidence and a reason. It does not establish that meeting one requirement satisfies the other, and it is not certification.